Multi-Brand Valuation Mandate for Intra-Group Transfer
Independent valuation of multiple brands conducted to support an intra-group transfer in compliance with accounting, tax and regulatory requirements
Description of the mandate: valuation of a French food and beverage brand portfolio for an intra-group transfer
The engagement focused on the determination of the economic value of a brand portfolio held by a French food and beverage group, in the context of an intra-group transfer required to comply with applicable accounting, tax and regulatory standards. The intangible asset valuation was intended to provide an arm's length royalty base, in line with ISO 10668 standards and OECD transfer pricing guidelines.
The highly diversified portfolio constituted the principal consumer-facing recognition vehicle across several product lines with heterogeneous margins and regional dynamics. The engagement relied on the relief-from-royalty method, complemented by a reconstitution cost approach.
Key challenges: economic, tax and operational articulation of a multi-brand portfolio
The main challenges of the mandate were:
- establishing a fair value for each brand, neither overstated nor overly conservative, consistent with the profitability of the corresponding product lines;
- ensuring compliance with ISO 10668 and the OECD arm's length principle;
- structuring a documented and defensible intra-group royalty grid able to withstand tax authority scrutiny;
- facilitating the centralisation of brand management and the traceability of value flows between group entities.
Approach and outcomes: combined comparable royalties and reconstitution costs
The valuation deployed a multi-method approach specific to intangible assets:
- the relief-from-royalty method, based on the capitalisation of avoided theoretical royalty flows, with rates derived from sector comparables sourced from international databases (RoyaltyStat, ktMINE);
- the reconstitution cost approach, retracing historical investments in marketing, packaging, product R&D and brand-building, to assess the economic reproducibility of each brand;
- a complementary analysis of transaction comparables in the food and beverage sector to calibrate the selected royalty rates;
- explicit articulation with the IFRS 13 fair value framework to ensure accounting enforceability.
The final report served as the reference for setting intra-group royalties, strengthening the legal certainty and financial coherence of the group at European scale. The engagement also contributed to structuring a centralised brand governance framework, facilitating the periodic monitoring of brand values in consolidated financial statements.
Illustrative example: numerical application to a diversified food and beverage portfolio
For illustrative purposes only — unrelated to the actual data of the mandate — a food and beverage portfolio composed of five brands generating cumulative revenue of EUR 80M could exhibit, with royalty rates ranging between 2% and 5% depending on brand awareness and segment (mainstream grocery vs premium brands), a total economic value of between EUR 12M and 22M. The royalties/costs/comparables triangle isolates each brand's specific contribution, distinguishing historical leaders with a strong awareness premium from regional brands with limited pricing power — an essential condition for a royalty grid defensible before tax authorities.
Summary: 2-month mandate, two cross-checked approaches, OECD-compliant intra-group royalty grid
Brand valuation mandate delivered in 2 months for a French food and beverage group undergoing intra-group reorganisation. Two approaches deployed (comparable royalties, reconstitution costs), compliant with ISO 10668 standards and OECD transfer pricing guidelines. Deliverable: independent report serving as the basis for the intra-group royalty grid and for the centralisation of brand portfolio management.
Frequently asked questions: methods, royalty rates, transfer pricing and OECD compliance
Why value brands in an intra-group reorganisation?
An intra-group brand transfer must take place at fair value to comply with the arm's length principle (OECD model treaty, Art. 9) and avoid tax reassessment. The independent valuation documents the value retained, serves as the basis for the intra-group royalty grid and provides a defensible file before the French tax authorities and other concerned jurisdictions. To go further: brand valuation approaches.
What royalty rate to apply in the food and beverage sector?
In food and beverage, royalty rates observed on licensing transactions generally lie between 1% and 6% of revenue, with significant dispersion depending on positioning (premium vs private label), brand awareness, geographic coverage and exclusivity granted. The RoyaltyStat and ktMINE databases enable a robust panel of sector comparables to be built to benchmark the selected rate.
How to ensure OECD transfer pricing compliance?
OECD compliance rests on three pillars: (i) a documented comparable royalty benchmark, (ii) a functional analysis specifying the functions, assets and risks of each entity, and (iii) economic consistency between the licensee's projected profitability and the selected rate. The report must include a defensible transfer pricing file.
How long does a multi-brand valuation take?
For a portfolio of 3 to 8 brands within the same sector, the standard mandate duration is 6 to 10 weeks, depending on the quality of internal documentation (marketing analyses, brand-level analytical accounting) and the number of jurisdictions involved. The mandate described was completed in 2 months.
Is the report reusable for IFRS accounting?
Yes. A report compliant with ISO 10668 standards and IFRS 13 fair value can be used for purchase price allocation (PPA), IAS 36 impairment tests and internal documentation of the brand portfolio. To go further: Purchase Price Allocation.
Should the valuation be updated periodically?
An annual or biennial update is recommended once the intra-group royalty grid is in place. Changes in revenue, margins, competitive positioning or tax framework (BEPS, Pillar 2) may affect the retained rate and value. Regular review secures the structure and anticipates tax audits.
Similar mandates: other brand and patent valuations in consumer and industrial sectors
The transactions shown include those completed by, or with the involvement of, Hectelion team members in current or previous professional roles. They are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not imply exclusive responsibility by Hectelion.
Discover our TRACK RECORD
The transactions presented were carried out by, with the contribution of, or with the participation of members of the Hectelion team in the context of functions performed currently or previously.