Brand Valuation Mandate in a Capital Reorganisation Context
Independent valuation of a long-established travel brand conducted as part of a capital reorganisation operation
Description of the mandate: brand valuation of a French travel group undergoing capital restructuring
The engagement focused on the determination of the economic value of a heritage brand held for several decades by a French travel group, in the context of a capital restructuring operation. The intangible asset valuation was intended to identify the brand's specific contribution to the group's overall value and to consider divestment, licensing or refinancing options based on this asset.
The valuation took place within a global restructuring of the group and supplemented two other parallel mandates (business valuation, financial instrument valuation) conducted as part of the same transaction.
Key challenges: objectifying intangible value in the context of creditor negotiation
The main challenges of the mandate were:
- assessing the brand's strength and its ability to generate future economic flows;
- distinguishing the brand's intangible value from the group's operating value;
- defining a valuation compliant with international ISO 10668 and IVS 210 standards;
- providing a negotiation tool with creditors and potential investors.
Approach and outcomes: cross-checking royalties, tourism comparables and historical costs
The valuation deployed several complementary approaches recognised for brands:
- the income approach (relief-from-royalty) — capitalisation of avoided theoretical royalty flows, calibrated against tourism/hospitality sector rates (1-4% of revenue depending on brand awareness);
- the market approach, based on a panel of comparable brands in tourism and hospitality;
- the complementary historical cost approach, retracing cumulative investments in marketing, visual identity and brand development;
- explicit articulation with IFRS 13 fair value to ensure accounting enforceability.
The valuation enabled the determination of a defensible economic value range for the brand, serving both as support for financial communication and as a negotiation tool with creditors. The work highlighted the patrimonial and emotional value of the brand and its decisive role in rebuilding the group's economic model.
Illustrative example: numerical application to a heritage tourism brand
For illustrative purposes only — unrelated to the actual data of the mandate — a heritage tourism brand generating EUR 150M in revenue with national assisted brand awareness above 70% could exhibit an economic value of between EUR 8M and 22M, depending on the royalty rate retained (1.5-3%) and the capitalisation horizon. The range widens in a restructuring context due to the illiquidity discount and uncertainty regarding operational recovery, but isolating the brand value allows it to be divested or licensed independently of operating flows, creating a liquidity option for creditors.
Summary: 6-week mandate, three cross-checked approaches, negotiation tool with creditors
Brand valuation mandate delivered in 6 weeks for a French travel group undergoing restructuring. Three approaches deployed (royalties, sector comparables, costs), compliant with ISO 10668 and IVS 210 standards. Deliverable: independent report complementary to the parallel business valuation and financial instrument valuation mandates.
Frequently asked questions: brand in restructuring, creditors and liquidity options
Why value the brand in a restructuring?
In a restructuring, an independent brand valuation enables (i) isolating a liquid asset potentially divestible or licensable separately, (ii) documenting collateral enforceable against creditors, (iii) supporting a refinancing option secured by the brand. It is an essential lever to preserve residual value.
What royalty rates for tourism and hospitality?
In tourism and hospitality, observed royalty rates range between 1% and 5% of revenue, with dispersion depending on brand awareness, geographic coverage and exclusivity granted. Comparables include hotel franchise contracts (Marriott, Accor) and tour-operator brand licences.
Can a brand be sold independently of the business?
Yes. A brand is a standalone intangible asset that can be the subject of a separate sale (asset deal) or a licensing concession. In a restructuring context, this option offers valuable strategic flexibility: monetising the brand while preserving operations, or vice versa.
How long does a brand valuation take?
The standard duration is 5 to 8 weeks, depending on the availability of marketing documentation (brand awareness, image studies, commercial performance by line) and portfolio complexity. The mandate described was completed in 6 weeks.
How to articulate this mandate with a business valuation?
The brand valuation is articulated with the business valuation via a consistency test: the sum of identified asset values (tangible + intangible including brand) must converge with the overall enterprise value, the difference constituting the residual goodwill. To go further: PPA.
Does the valuation remain valid if the company recovers?
The valuation reflects the assumptions at the report date (restructuring situation). In case of operational recovery, an update is recommended because the illiquidity discount and specific risk premium decrease, mechanically increasing the brand's economic value. An annual review is generally appropriate.
Similar mandates: other brand valuations and restructurings
The transactions shown include those completed by, or with the involvement of, Hectelion team members in current or previous professional roles. They are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not imply exclusive responsibility by Hectelion.
Discover our TRACK RECORD
The transactions presented were carried out by, with the contribution of, or with the participation of members of the Hectelion team in the context of functions performed currently or previously.